Stone Weierstrass Theorem

Note

A list of all versions of S-W we’ve seen:

  1. Theorem 6: S-W for -subalgebras
  2. Corollary 10: S-W for -subalgebras as seen in Rudin (1976) 7.32.
  3. Theorem 11: S-W for -subalgebras
  4. Theorem 324.1: characterization of -subalgebras which separate points
  5. Theorem 324.10: S-W for -subalgebras and locally compact spaces

Proposition 315.1(Dini).

Let be a compact metric space. Suppose is monotone1 and converges pointwise to . Then, converges to uniformly.

132392

Note that , with its vector space (-module) and ring structure, is an -algebra (Definition 108.5).

Definition 315.2.

Let be compact. A subset is a subalgebra if

  1. for every ,
  2. and , .

separates points if for every distinct , there exists such that . is said to contain constants/be unital if .

Lemma 315.3.

There is a sequence of real valued polynomials with zero constant coefficient which converge uniformly to on .

968bc3

Definition 315.4.

A subset is a lattice if for every , and are in .

Lemma 315.5.

Let be compact. A closed subalgebra of is a lattice.

2d581a

Theorem 315.6(Stone-Weierstrass for, v1).

Let be a compact metric space. Let be a unital subalgebra which separates points. Then, is dense in .

b2e532

Corollary 315.7.

Let be compact. Then polynomials in coordinates are dense in .

b3f0b7

Exercise 315.8.

Suppose such that

for all . Show that .

Lemma 315.9.

Let be a compact metric space. If is a subalgebra of which vanishes at no point of , then is unital.

54eba1

We have the following corollary of Theorem 6 and Lemma 9.

Corollary 315.10(Stone-Weierstrass over, v2).

Let be a compact metric space. Let be a subalgebra which separates points and vanishes at no point of . Then, is dense in .

61ec7e

The Theorem 6 analog for complex algebras requires additional hypotheses. A complex algebra is called self-adjoint if implies .

Theorem 315.11(Stone-Weierstrass for, v3).

Let be a compact metric space. Let be a unital self-adjoint subalgebra which separates points. Then is dense in .

c03f69

Footnotes

  1. is a monotone sequence for every

  2. We can say this because the polynomials have zero constant coefficient. If that were not the case, we would have had to require to contain constants.

  3. .


References

Rudin, W. (1976). Principles of Mathematical Analysis (3d ed). McGraw-Hill.