More generalizations of S-W
Theorem 324.1(Stone-Weierstrass, v4).
04f340Let be a compact metric space, and let be a subalgebra which separates points. Then either or for some , where is the set of all which vanish at .
Proof.
If , then by Theorem 315.6. So assume . By Lemma 315.9, there exists such that for all . We will show that .
Define . Note that is a unital subalgebra of . separates points since separates points. By Theorem 315.6, is dense in . Suppose such that . There exists a sequence converging uniformly to . Since for each , we must have . It follows that converges uniformly to .□
S-W for locally compact spaces
Definition 324.2.
is said to be locally compact if for all , there exists open such that is compact. may be called a compact neighborhood.
A normed linear space is locally compact iff it is finite dimensional. Open subsets of compact metric spaces are locally compact.
In an NLS, locally compact all closed balls are compact.
Definition 324.3.
Let be a locally compact metric space1. Let . is defined to be open if
- and is open in , or
- and is compact.
Let denote the collection of subsets declared open.
Claim 324.4.
is a topological space.
Proof.
It is clear that . Let be an arbitrary union of open sets in . If none of them contain , then their union is open in , and hence open in . If one of the ‘s, say , contains , rewrite the union as . Note that each is closed in , and is compact. It follows that the intersection is compact, so its complement is open in . Similar analysis shows that the open sets in are closed under finite intersections.□
Claim 324.5.
9f6702is compact.
Proof.
Let cover . One of them must contain , and hence their complement is compact, which then has a finite subcover.□
Note the similarities to the two-point compactification performed in Exercise 15.1.
We will not prove the following fact:
Fact 324.6.
94c81eIf is a locally compact and separable metric space then is metrizable.
Definition 324.7.
Let be a locally compact metric space. Define
Exercise 324.8.
with the norm is a Banach space.
Proof.
It is clear that, which we know to be a Banach space by Remark 163.6. Let be a sequence in converging to . Let . Let be such that . Let be a compact subset of such that on . It follows that on .□
It is now clear that is an -algebra.
Proposition 324.9.
a62cffLet be locally compact. There exists an isomorphism (bijective linear norm preserving ring homomorphism).
Proof.
We have the obvious map where
First, we have to show that . Let be an open subset of not containing . Then, , which is open in since it is open in and doesn’t contain . Suppose . Let be such that . There exists compact such that2 , or . Note that . Since is closed and is continuous, is closed in . Since it is a subset of a compact set, it follows that is compact. It follows that is open in .
The map is clearly injective, linear, norm preserving, and a ring homomorphism. Showing that is onto takes some work, but it is very similar in nature to the preceding paragraph and I can’t be bothered.□
Theorem 324.10(Stone-Weierstrass, v5).
8f3e36Let be a locally compact metric space. Suppose is a subalgebra which separates points and does not vanish on . Then is dense in .
Proof.
Let be as in Proposition 9. Then, is a subalgebra which separates points. From Claim 5, Fact 6 and Theorem 1, . Since is an isometry between and , it follows that .□