Problem 1

Let . Let . Let , , , and .

Exercise 304.1.

Show that are prime ideals for . Are they maximal ideals?

We know by Lemma 332.2 that . Using Example 107.16,

Clearly, is irreducible in . Since is a PID (and hence a UFD by Proposition 114.11), the notions of prime, maximal, and irreducible coincide (Proposition 114.10, Proposition 109.9). Thus, is a field, and is a maximal ideal. Similarly, , , and are maximal ideals.

Exercise 304.2.

Show that are irreducible in .

2b7447

The field norm (Exercise 302.2) defined on is multiplicative and takes on positive integer values when restricted to . If , we must have . This forces either or . The remaining elements are irreducible by the same argument.

Exercise 304.3.

Show that .

Compute:

By subtracting the first two generators, we get . It follows that . Since divides all the generators obtained above, we have .

Exercise 304.4.

Is ?

. Note that , , and are pairwise comaximal. By Theorem 111.2,

Exercise 304.5.

Let . Determine which of these are prime ideals.

is prime in iff is prime in . Note that , so . Now,

Since is not prime in , it follows that is not prime in .

Warning

Recall that is not a UFD, so showing is irreducible does not help!

. By Proposition 112.5.3, is not prime.

is dealt with similarly:

Since is prime in , is prime in .

Exercise 304.6.

Let . Show that is a principal ideal.

. , so . and , so .


Problem 2

Let and .

Exercise 304.7.

Show that .