Problem 1
Let . Let . Let , , , and .
Exercise 304.1.
Show that are prime ideals for . Are they maximal ideals?
We know by Lemma 332.2 that . Using Example 107.16,
Clearly, is irreducible in . Since is a PID (and hence a UFD by Proposition 114.11), the notions of prime, maximal, and irreducible coincide (Proposition 114.10, Proposition 109.9). Thus, is a field, and is a maximal ideal. Similarly, , , and are maximal ideals.
Exercise 304.2.
2b7447Show that are irreducible in .
The field norm (Exercise 302.2) defined on is multiplicative and takes on positive integer values when restricted to . If , we must have . This forces either or . The remaining elements are irreducible by the same argument.
Exercise 304.3.
Show that .
Compute:
By subtracting the first two generators, we get . It follows that . Since divides all the generators obtained above, we have .
Exercise 304.4.
Is ?
. Note that , , and are pairwise comaximal. By Theorem 111.2,
Exercise 304.5.
Let . Determine which of these are prime ideals.
is prime in iff is prime in . Note that , so . Now,
Since is not prime in , it follows that is not prime in .
Warning
Recall that is not a UFD, so showing is irreducible does not help!
. By Proposition 112.5.3, is not prime.
is dealt with similarly:
Since is prime in , is prime in .
Exercise 304.6.
Let . Show that is a principal ideal.
. , so . and , so .
Problem 2
Let and .
Exercise 304.7.
Show that .