Algebraic closures
Embeddings
Definition 338.1.
Let and let be an embedding. induces an isomorphism of with its image , written as . An embedding of into is said to be over if . If is an inclusion, we say is an embedding of over .
Remark 338.2.
0d49d1Note that if is a root of , then is a root of .
Example 338.3.
There does not exist an embedding of into over . Suppose were such an embedding, with . must satisfy the following for all :
which is not possible since .
Lemma 338.4.
fce9e7Let be an algebraic extension of , and let be an embedding of into itself over . Then is an automorphism.
Proof.
It suffices to prove that is surjective. Let , let be its irreducible polynomial over . Let be the roots of which lie in , and let 1. is finite by Prp 322.8. By Rmk 2, are roots of , so . Since is the smallest field containing and , it follows that . Since there exists2 a -basis of of the form
we have and hence 3. Since , it follows that is in the image of .□
Question
In the proof of Lem 4, is it always true that for all ? More concretely, can you give me an irreducible polynomial over and a field extension such that has at least three roots in , and and are strictly contained in for all ?
Extensions in which a given polynomial splits
Proposition 338.5.
b196e5Let be a field and a polynomial in of degree . Then there exists an extension of in which has a root.
Proof.
WLOG, we can assume is irreducible. Let be the field . Consider the canonical homomorphism
Note that is an embedding of into . Let be the image of under . Let , and let4
Then
Thus, is a root of . If you’re like me, you’d say we’re done: , and we just found an extension in which has a root. To be extra rigorous, you can define a set such that , extend to a bijection , and pull back the field structure of to to get a “true” field extension of ; see Lang (2002) 5.2.3.
Note that is a finite extension, since is a -basis for .□
Corollary 338.6.
0edfc6Let be a field and let be polynomials in of degrees . Then there exists an extension in which each has a root.
Proof.
Using Prp 5, let be an extension in which has a root. We may view as a polynomial over . Let be an extension of in which has a root. Proceed inductively.□
Algebraically closed fields and algebraic closures
Definition 338.7.
- A field is said to be algebraically closed if every polynomial in of degree has a root in .
- An algebraic closure of a field is an algebraic extension of which is algebraically closed.
Proposition 338.8.
c6f453Every algebraic extension of an algebraically closed field is trivial.
Proof.
Suppose is algebraically closed and is an algebraic extension. Let and be its irreducible polynomial. Since is algebraically closed, splits into linear factors in , so all of its roots lie in . It follows that , and .□
Theorem 338.9(Existence of algebraically closed extensions, Lang (2002) 5.2.5).
b76417Let be a field. Then there exists an algebraically closed extension .
Proof.
We first construct an extension of in which every polynomial in of degree has a root. To each polynomial of degree , associate a symbol and let be the set of all such symbols. Form the polynomial ring . We claim that the ideal generated by all the polynomials in is not the unit ideal. It it is. then there is a finite combination of elements in our ideal which is equal to :
with . We will write instead of . The polynomials will involve only a finite number of variables, say (with ). Our relation then reads
By Cor 6, there exists a finite extension in which each polynomial has a root, say is a root of in . Let for . Take the image of both sides under the evaluation map . We get , a contradiction.
By Thm 111.1 there exists a maximal ideal containing the ideal generated by all polynomials in . is a field, and we have a canonical map
As in the proof of Prp 5, is an embedding of into , which is an extension of . For any polynomial of degree , is a root of 4:
Using the same type of set-theoretic argument5 as in Prp 5, we conclude there exists an extension of in which every polynomial of degree has a root.
Inductively, we can form a sequence of fields
such that every polynomial in of degree has a root in . Now, define
Then is naturally a field, for if then there exists some such that , and we can take their product or sum in . Every polynomial in has its coefficients in some subfield , hence a root in , hence a root in , as desired.□
Theorem 338.10(Existence of algebraic closures, Lang (2002) 5.2.6).
b35e3dLet be a field. There exists an algebraic extension of which is algebraically closed, called the algebraic closure of .
Proof.
Let be the algebraically closed extension supplied by Thm 9. Using Prp 334.1, let be the subextension formed by the elements of that are algebraic over . Then is algebraic over . If and is algebraic over , then by Prp 119.19 is algebraic over . If is a polynomial of degree in , then has a root in , and is algebraic over . Hence is in and is algebraically closed.□
Proposition 338.11.
If is a field which is not finite, then any algebraic extension of has the same cardinality as .
Proof.
Let be the cardinality of . It follows that has cardinality . If is an algebraic extension, Each has an associated . Since any can accommodate only finitely many roots, it follows that has cardinality .□
Uniqueness of algebraic closures
Lemma 338.12.
8f77a8Let be a field and an embedding of into 6. Let be an algebraic extension of generated by one element. Let . Let . Then, there exists a bijection
Proof.
Let be a root of in . By Prp 119.13, is a -basis for . Thus, every element of can be uniquely expressed in the form , . Define an extension of by . We do not need to prove that is well-defined owing to the unique representation afforded by the basis. Let .
clearly satisfies . Thus, is a homomorphism. It is also clear from the above computation that () must be zero for to be a homomorphism, forcing to map to a root of .□
Next, we inspect extensions of to arbitrary algebraic extensions of .
Theorem 338.13.
fff473Let be an algebraic extension, and an embedding of in an algebraically closed field . Then there exists an embedding of into over . If is algebraically closed and is algebraic over , then any such embedding over is an isomorphism of onto .
Proof.
Let be the set of all pairs where is a subfield of containing , and is an extension of to an embedding of into . We write a partial order by if and . Note that is not empty since it contains . If is a totally ordered subset, we let and define on to be equal to on each . Then is an upper bound for the totally ordered subset. By Zorn’s lemma, let be a maximal element in . Then is an extension of .
We contend that . Otherwise, there exists , . If is the irreducible polynomial of over , must have a root in since is algebraically closed. It follows from Lem 12 that there exists an extension extending , contradicting the maximality of . This proves that there exists an extension of to .
If is algebraically closed, and is algebraic over , then is algebraically closed and is algebraic over , hence by Prp 8.□
An immediate corollary:
Corollary 338.14(Uniqueness of algebraic closures).
Let be a field and , be algebraic extensions. Assume that are algebraically closed. Then there exists an isomorphism over .
Footnotes
-
It may very well be that . In other words, being irreducible in and being an extension containing a root of does not imply that is the splitting field of . ↩
-
See Prp 119.13 and the proof of Prp 322.2. ↩
-
Knowing , an alternative way to glean is to observe that since is an injective -module homomorphism, is a subspace of having the same dimension . ↩
-
If we do not do this, we technically cannot take the union later on in the proof; you can, however take the colimit instead. See Buzzard (n.d.) ↩
-
Lang (2002, p. 233) assumes is algebraically closed. I do not see where this this hypothesis is used, and hence have removed it. ↩