Claim 325.1.

Let be fields. Let be fields such that and for every . Then is a subfield of .

9d1148

If is an algebraic extension, is always finite? No. Consider

. is a field by Claim 1, and is clearly an algebraic extension of . However, cannot be finite; easy contradiction if it were.


If is a ring homomorphism, then contains only one irreducible element up to association ( is a PID!).


[!Definition]
Let be algebraic. Then is the smallest subfield of containing and .

[!Proposition]
. Let and . Then .

[!Proof]-
Let be a -basis for . Let be an -basis of .
Claim: is a spanning set. This is clear, so the lemma follows. However, the set above also happens to be a basis. This is also clear.

[!Lemma]
are algebraic over . Then is a finite extension of , and hence an algebraic extension of .

[!Proof]-
By induction on . is finite, so By induction hypothesis, . . Want .

Note that , because is the smallest subfield of containing and is algebraic over . The rest follows from the previous proposition.