Review

is open in
is a union of open balls in
is a neighborhood of each point in each point in is an interior point of
is the interior of .

is closed in
is open in
contains all of its limit points which occur in .
is the closure of . (Rudin, 2.27. Easy proof)

More stuff about open and closed sets:

  • Every finite subset of a metric space is closed in . Particularly, singleton subsets of are closed in .
  • Any metric space is an open and closed subset of itself.
  • In any metric space , a singleton set is open in iff its element is an isolated point of .

Interior of , denoted by , is the set of all interior points of . It is defined as the union of all open sets contained within . It is the largest open set contained within .
Closure of , denoted by , is the set along with all of its limit points. The set of all limit points of is denoted by . Thus, . is the intersection of all the closed sets containing . is the smallest closed set containing .

Arbitrary unions of open sets are open. Finite intersections of open sets are open.
Arbitrary intersections of closed sets are closed. Finite unions of closed sets are closed.
Open and closed sets under intersections and unions

We have developed two ways to think about continuity - the epsilon-delta definition and the theorem about inverse images under a continuous function of open sets being open sets.

We observe a simple result that Rudin fails to mention:

Continuous functions map convergent sequences to convergent sequences

Theorem 1.

Let be continuous on . Let be a sequence in which converges to . Then, must converge to .

Proof
If there is a sequence converging to , then is a limit point of . So, being continuous on implies must exist, and must equal . We know from the sequence criterion that means . ❏

Closed sets in contain their suprema

A stray theorem form Rudin.

Rudin, 2.28

Theorem 2.

Let be a non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded above. Then, . Hence if is closed and bounded.

Proof
For any , there must exist such that . Thus, , i.e, is a limit point of , and . ❏


Algebra of continuous functions

Rudin, 4.9

Theorem 3.

Let be continuous, where is a metric space. Then, , , and (assuming for all ) are continuous on .

Proof
Every function defined on is continuous at isolated points of . So we only need to consider the case when is not an isolated point of , i.e, a limit point of . Since and are continuous, this gives us and , which gives us . ❏


Vector valued functions whose components are continuous

Rudin, 4.10

Theorem 4.

Let . Let be defined by . Then, is continuous each is continuous.

Proof
We only need to consider which are limit points of . Consider the forward implication. We have , from the definition of continuity. Let be arbitrary. There must exist such that implies for every . Thus, for every . Note the similarity to the proof of the forward implication of slot wise convergence. The proof of the backward implication of this theorem is also essentially the same as its counterpart, with ‘s replaced with ‘s, the maximum of all ‘s replaced with the minimum of all ‘s, and other tiny contextual changes. ❏

Theorem 5.

If and are continuous mappings of into , and are continuous.

This follows from the two previous theorems.


Examples of continuous functions

Rudin, 4.11

  • , , where is a continuous function.
  • The mapping is continuous.

Subspace topology

Rudin, 2.30

Theorem 6.

Suppose . A subset of is open relative to if and only if for some open subset in .

Proof of
Since is open relative to , each should have an associated with it such that . Consider the set

Clearly, is open in since it is a union of open balls in .
Clearly, .
.
Thus, . ❏

Proof of
Let for some open subset in . For every , there exists such that . ❏

An analogue for closed sets:

Theorem 7(Corollary).

Suppose . A subset of is closed relative to if and only if for some closed subset in .

Proof
is closed in is open in for some open in , where is closed in . ❏

Restrictions of continuous functions are continuous

Theorem 8.

Let be continuous. Then, the restriction of to every is also continuous.

Proof
We know that (open set in ) is open in . We need to show that (open set in ) is open in . The result follows immediately from the previous theorem. ❏


An introduction to compactness

Three versions of compactness are defined:

  1. Sequential compactness
  2. Limit point compactness
  3. Open cover compactness

All three are equivalent for metric spaces. They are defined, and not equivalent for general topological spaces.

Compactness is intrinsic

Consider the following definitions for sequential compactness:

  1. is called sequentially compact if every sequence in has a convergent subsequence (converging to a point in , of course).
  2. is called sequentially compact if every sequence in has a convergent subsequence converging to a point in (not something you would put in parenthesis here).

While (2) might seem more general at a cursory glance, notice that both definitions are equivalent, since considering in isolation in (1) and as a subset in (2) makes no difference. In other words, context does not matter. Contrast this with the properties of being open or closed, which depend on context. For example, is open and closed in , open in , and neither in . This is true, as we will see, for the other two forms of compactness as well.

Limit point compactness

Definition 9.

is called limit point compact if every infinite set in has a limit point (in ).

Notice that you can make an analogous definition to (2) in the previous section, and it would be equivalent to the one stated above.

Show that sequential compactness and limit point compactness are the same thing.