Orbit-stabilizer theorem

Theorem 1.

Let be a group. Let be a group action. The orbits of partition .

This was expected, since we saw in the previous lecture that the orbits of elements of under the conjugation action were conjugacy classes, and we know that the conjugacy classes of partition .

Theorem 2(Orbit-stabilizer theorem).

Let and . Then, for all .

Proof
Let . We will construct a bijection between and , where the former is the set of all left cosets of in (may not be a group, since is not necessarily normal). Define the map by . is well defined, because implies for some , so . is injective, since implies , which implies , which implies . is surjective since implies for some , so .

The action of on is called transitive if there is only one orbit.


The class equation

Definition 3.

Two elements and of are said to be conjugate in if there is some such that (i.e, iff there are in the same orbit of acting on itself by conjugation). The orbits of acting on itself by conjugation are called the conjugacy classes of .

Notes:

  • If then, unlike the action by left multiplication, does not act transitively on itself by conjugation because is always a conjugacy class.
  • is a conjugacy class iff .

acting on itself by conjugation can be generalized to acting on its power set by conjugation: , , . Note that the action of acting on itself by conjugation is embedded in this action, since , . As expected, we call two subsets and of to be conjugates if they are in the same orbit.

Given , the orbit stabilizer theorem allows us to compute the size of its conjugacy class to be the index of the stabilizer of . Now, . Thus, the size of the conjugacy class of is .

Theorem 4(Proposition).

The size of the conjugacy class of a subset of a group is the index of the normalizer of in . In particular, the size of the conjugacy class of is the index of the centralizer of in .

The second statement follows from the fact that .

The fact that the orbits partition the set being acted upon yields the following equation:

Theorem 5(The class equation).

Let be a finite group and let be representatives of the distinct conjugacy classes of not contained in the center . Then,

Note that all summands on the RHS of the class equation are divisors of .


p-groups

Groups of order , , where is prime, are called p-groups.

Theorem 6.

If is a p-group, is non-trivial.

Proof
Follows directly from the class equation: (each non-trivial conjugacy class must be a multiple of )

Theorem 7.

If , then .

Proof
FTSOC, assume and . Then, , so is cyclic. Thus, is abelian. But this implies , a contradiction.

Theorem 8.

If for some prime , then is abelian. More precisely, either or .

Proof
It follows directly from the two preceding theorems that is abelian. Let . If has an element of order , , and . Else, must have two elements and such that and .
Lagrange’s theorem forces . Thus, , so . These facts along with and allow us to write . Thus, .

Sylow’s theorems have a lot more to say about p-groups and subgroups.


Conjugacy in Sn

Cycle decomposition of conjugates

Definition 9.

Define an action of on the set of all -tuples with distinct entries form , as

is called an entry permutation of .

Define a map by

is called a place permutation of . Note that is NOT an action of on .

Since the action is transitive, it makes sense to ask: given and , which satisfies ?

Let denote the tuple . Observe that for all . Thus, there exists such that . So, the equation reduces to , and since is a group action, it reduces further to . Now, let . Since , .

Therefore, we have

Therefore, given and , conjugating by gives us the entry permutation equivalent to the place permutation . The following theorem follows.

Theorem 10.

Let . Let the cycle decomposition of be (what follow are NOT tuples)

Then has cycle decomposition

This should be reminiscent of how change of basis works in linear algebra: If , then .

Conjugacy classes of Sn

Definition 11.

If is the product of disjoint cycles of lengths with (including its 1-cycles) then the integers are called the cycle type of .

Theorem 12.

Two elements of are conjugate in iff they have the same cycle type. The number of conjugacy classes of equals the number of partitions of .


More on Automorphisms

Theorem 13.

Let . Then, acts by conjugation on as automorphisms of . The permutation representation of this action is a homomorphism of into with kernel . In particular, is isomorphic to a subgroup of .

It follows that for any subgroup of , the quotient group is isomorphic to a subgroup of (take in the above theorem).
Thus, any information we have about for translates to information about .

Definition 14.

Let be a group and let . Conjugation by is called an inner automorphism of and the subgroup of consisting of all inner automorphisms is denoted by .

Note that if in the above theorem, we get that is isomorphic to .

Theorem 15(Corollary).

.

So, a group is abelian iff every inner automorphism is trivial.

Theorem 16(Corollary).

If is an abelian normal subgroup of and is not contained in , then there is some such that conjugation by restricted to is not an inner automorphism of .

Proof
If for all , conjugation by restricted to is an inner automorphism of (note that since is abelian, all inner automorphisms of are trivial), for all . This would imply , a contradiction.

Automorphism groups

Theorem 17.

, where is the group of units modulo .

Proof
Let be a generator of . If , then for some , and uniquely determines . Denote this automorphism by . Since is an automorphism, and must have the same order, so . Furthermore, for every relatively prime to , the map is an automorphism of . Hence we have a bijective map

which is a homomorphism because

for all , so that

Theorem 18.

If and are two groups whose orders are relatively prime, then .

Characteristic groups

Definition 19.

A subgroup of a group is called characteristic in , denoted , if every automorphism of maps to itself.

Note that this definition is stronger than that of a normal subgroup, which only requires every inner automorphism of to map to itself.

It should be obvious that characteristic subgroups are normal. Also, if is the unique subgroup of of a given order, then , since every must map to another subgroup of that is isomorphic to , and only one such group exists, namely itself.

Theorem 20.

If and , then .

Proof
Let . Let be the conjugation restricted to . Note that this may not be an inner automorphism of ; this is why does not suffice. Since , . Thus, for all , and .