The free group
Definition 1.
A set of group elements that satisfy no relations except those implied by the axioms is called free, and a group that has a free set of generators is called a free group.
To construct a free group, start with an arbitrary set, say . Let be the set that contains the symbols and for every , ., . The elements of are called symbols, and define a word to be a finite string of symbols, in which repetition is allowed. Let be the set of all words, with the empty string . Define the product operation on to be concatenation. Obviously, is not a group, since inverses do not exist (yet).
If a word looks like for some , we may agree to “cancel” the two symbols and . Call a word reduced if no such reduction can be made. Starting with any , we can make a finite sequence of reductions to arrive at a reduced word , which is called the reduced form of . There may be more than one way to arrive at the reduced word. If we want the notion of a reduced word to be well defined, we must ensure that all paths lead to .
Theorem 2.
There is only one reduced word for a given word .
Proof by induction on (easy). ref.
Define an equivalence relation on by if and have the same reduced word. Next, observe that products of equivalent words are equivalent, that is, and imply . Therefore, it follows that the equivalence classes of words can be multiplied.
Theorem 3.
The set of equivalence classes is a group, with the law of composition induced from multiplication in .
Proof
The facts that multiplication is associative and that the class of the empty word is an identity follows from the corresponding facts in . Also, for any , is clearly its inverse.
The group of equivalence classes in is called the free group on the set , and is denoted by .
Thus, for any group , there exists a unique free group generated by . Also, if , the free groups generated by and are isomorphic. Thus, the free group of rank is defined.
From now on, we will not distinguish between any two words belonging to the same class in (words which are equivalent modulo the group axioms). Thus, “word” will refer to a class in .
Generators and relations
Definition 4.
A relation among elements of a group is a word in the free group on the set that evaluates to in .
Theorem 5.
Let be a subset of a group . There exists a unique smallest normal subgroup of which contains , called the normal subgroup generated by . If a normal subgroup of contains , it contains . The elements of can be described as follows: Let be the set consisting of elements and with . An element of is in if it can be written as a product of some arbitrary length, where each is a conjugate of an element in .
Definition 6.
Let be the free group on a set , and let be a set of elements of . The group generated by with relations is the quotient group , where is the normal subgroup of generated by . is denoted by .
Note that is precisely the set of words in which equate to the identity in . Let be the set consisting of elements and with . Let be the set of all conjugates of the members of : . Now, any word in which evaluates to the identity can be expressed as a product of the elements of . For example, if , we know that the word evaluates to the identity. It can be represented as a product of the members of as
Now, for , consider the coset . These are a set of words whose equivalence can be established using the relations (observe that since is normal, contains every possible word equivalent to that you can think of: ). Thus, the cosets of in correspond to the distinct words in the group , modulo the relations in .
Theorem 7(Mapping property of the Free group / universal property).
Let be the free group on a set , and let be a group. Any map of sets extends uniquely to a group homomorphism . If we denote the image of an element of by (and define ), the image of a word will be .
Theorem 8(Corollary).
Let be a group and . is a set of relations among the elements of satisfied in , is a free group on , and is the normal subgroup of generated by . Let .
There is a canonical homomorphism .
Proof
The mapping property gives us a homomorphism with . Clearly, . Since is a normal subgroup and thus is closed under the operations we used to construct , must also be contained in . The mapping property of quotient groups gives us a map . This is the map .
Now,
- is surjective iff generates , and
- is injective iff every relation among the elements of is in . In other words, is injective iff .
is obvious; to see , assume there exists a relation among the elements of which is not present in . Then, and will be distinct cosets in . However, both and will be contained in . Thus, . Therefore, is not injective.
If the map is bijective, we say forms a complete set of relations among the generators , and .
A more rigorous treatment
Alternatively, you can take the universal property to be the defining property of a free group, and then prove that our previous construction is indeed a free group by showing that it satisfies the universal property:
Definition 9.
Let be a set. A free group generated by satisfies the following universal property: for any group and any function there is a unique group homomorphism extending , so that the following diagram commutes:
where the map from to is the inclusion map. We call a free generating set for .Here’s a roadmap:
First, we will verify that the group we have constructed in the first section is indeed a free group.
Then, we will prove that any two free groups generated by the same set S are isomorphic.
This universality allows us to treat our specific construction as the free group on S, without loss of generality.
Then, we will show that any two free generating sets of a free group have the same cardinality, which is equal to (The rank of a group is the smallest cardinality of a generating set of the group).
This allows us to define the “free group of rank ” to be a free group freely generated by a set of cardinality .
Finally, we will show that a group is finitely generated iff it is the quotient of a finitely generated free group.
Theorem 10.
Let be a set. Consider the group of equivalence classes of words on modulo the group axioms we constructed in the previous section. is a free group.
Proof
To prove that is a free group, we must verify that it satisfies the universal property. Let be an arbitrary group and be any function. We need to construct a group homomorphism and show it is unique and extends . Since is generated by the set (where denotes the equivalence class of the word ), and every element of is an equivalence class of reduced words formed by concatenating elements of , we define as follows:
- For , set .
- For , set , the inverse of in .
- For a general reduced word in , where each , define , where the product is taken in .
Note that extends by construction. First, we must check that this is well-defined. Since elements of are equivalence classes, if and reduce to the same reduced word via cancellations. The group structure of ensures that if in (e.g., , ), then , the identity in . Thus, the value of depends only on the equivalence class , and the definition is consistent.
Next, we verify that is a homomorphism. For and in , their product is , possibly after reduction. Then:
where any cancellations in the concatenation correspond to trivial products (e.g., ) in . Thus, is a group homomorphism.
Finally, we prove uniqueness. Suppose is another homomorphism satisfying . Then, for each , . Since generates , and and are homomorphisms agreeing on the generators, they must agree on all of . Hence, satisfies the universal property and is a free group generated by .
Theorem 11.
Let be a set. Then, up to isomorphism, there is only one free group generated by .
Theorem 12.
Let be a free group and be a free generating set, then .
Proof
By the universal property, for every function form to , there is a homomorphism from to ; conversely, every homomorphism can be defined this way (since generates and the value of a homomorphism on determines it uniquely). Hence there are exactly homomorphisms from to . Now, let be another generating set of , not necessarily free. There are maps from to . However, since is not a free generating set, not all of these will extend to well-defined homomorphisms. However, it still remains true that every homomorphism can be defined by a map from to . Thus, there are at most homomorphisms from to . So, is an upper bound for , and hence . Thus, is the smallest cardinality of a generating set of , and .Theorem 13(Corollary).
All free generating sets of have the same cardinality. In other words, if , then .
Using this corollary and the uniqueness of free groups, we can finally define the free group of rank .
Definition 14.
Let and let where are distinct elements. Then we write for the free group freely generated by , and call it the free group of rank .
Theorem 15.
A group is finitely generated iff it is the quotient of a finitely generated free group.
Proof
By the first isomorphism theorem, this is equivalent to the statement: a group is finitely generated iff there exists a finitely generated free group and a surjective homomorphism . Note that a quotient of a finitely generated group is finitely generated (the image of the generators generate the image). Conversely, let be a finitely generated group, say generated by the finite set . Let be the free group generated by , then is finitely generated. From the universal property, we find a homomorphism that is identity on (hence surjective), then , as desired.