The free group

Definition 1.

A set of group elements that satisfy no relations except those implied by the axioms is called free, and a group that has a free set of generators is called a free group.

To construct a free group, start with an arbitrary set, say . Let be the set that contains the symbols and for every , ., . The elements of are called symbols, and define a word to be a finite string of symbols, in which repetition is allowed. Let be the set of all words, with the empty string . Define the product operation on to be concatenation. Obviously, is not a group, since inverses do not exist (yet).

If a word looks like for some , we may agree to “cancel” the two symbols and . Call a word reduced if no such reduction can be made. Starting with any , we can make a finite sequence of reductions to arrive at a reduced word , which is called the reduced form of . There may be more than one way to arrive at the reduced word. If we want the notion of a reduced word to be well defined, we must ensure that all paths lead to .

Theorem 2.

There is only one reduced word for a given word .

Proof by induction on (easy). ref.

Define an equivalence relation on by if and have the same reduced word. Next, observe that products of equivalent words are equivalent, that is, and imply . Therefore, it follows that the equivalence classes of words can be multiplied.

Theorem 3.

The set of equivalence classes is a group, with the law of composition induced from multiplication in .

Proof
The facts that multiplication is associative and that the class of the empty word is an identity follows from the corresponding facts in . Also, for any , is clearly its inverse.

The group of equivalence classes in is called the free group on the set , and is denoted by .

Thus, for any group , there exists a unique free group generated by . Also, if , the free groups generated by and are isomorphic. Thus, the free group of rank is defined.

From now on, we will not distinguish between any two words belonging to the same class in (words which are equivalent modulo the group axioms). Thus, “word” will refer to a class in .

Generators and relations

Definition 4.

A relation among elements of a group is a word in the free group on the set that evaluates to in .

Theorem 5.

Let be a subset of a group . There exists a unique smallest normal subgroup of which contains , called the normal subgroup generated by . If a normal subgroup of contains , it contains . The elements of can be described as follows: Let be the set consisting of elements and with . An element of is in if it can be written as a product of some arbitrary length, where each is a conjugate of an element in .

Definition 6.

Let be the free group on a set , and let be a set of elements of . The group generated by with relations is the quotient group , where is the normal subgroup of generated by . is denoted by .

Note that is precisely the set of words in which equate to the identity in . Let be the set consisting of elements and with . Let be the set of all conjugates of the members of : . Now, any word in which evaluates to the identity can be expressed as a product of the elements of . For example, if , we know that the word evaluates to the identity. It can be represented as a product of the members of as

Now, for , consider the coset . These are a set of words whose equivalence can be established using the relations (observe that since is normal, contains every possible word equivalent to that you can think of: ). Thus, the cosets of in correspond to the distinct words in the group , modulo the relations in .

Theorem 7(Mapping property of the Free group / universal property).

Let be the free group on a set , and let be a group. Any map of sets extends uniquely to a group homomorphism . If we denote the image of an element of by (and define ), the image of a word will be .

Theorem 8(Corollary).

Let be a group and . is a set of relations among the elements of satisfied in , is a free group on , and is the normal subgroup of generated by . Let .
There is a canonical homomorphism .

Proof
The mapping property gives us a homomorphism with . Clearly, . Since is a normal subgroup and thus is closed under the operations we used to construct , must also be contained in . The mapping property of quotient groups gives us a map . This is the map .

Now,

  1. is surjective iff generates , and
  2. is injective iff every relation among the elements of is in . In other words, is injective iff .

is obvious; to see , assume there exists a relation among the elements of which is not present in . Then, and will be distinct cosets in . However, both and will be contained in . Thus, . Therefore, is not injective.

If the map is bijective, we say forms a complete set of relations among the generators , and .