All rings are commutative with .
Problem 11
Let be a PID.
Exercise 290.1.
389f77Let be a proper ideal in . Show that for some maximal ideals .
Proof.
Suppose. Since is a UFD, we can write as a product of irreducibles . Each is prime, so each is a prime ideal, and hence each is maximal. It is now easy to see that .□
Exercise 290.2.
cf1276An ideal in is said to be primary if and implies for some . Show that an ideal is primary iff for some irreducible element .
Proof.
Let where for irreducibles . Suppose is primary. Suppose and are not associates. Let have associates in . Let and . Then, . However, does not divide for any , and does not divide for any . So, does not divide or for any , a contradiction. Thus, every pair in is a pair of associates. It follows that .
Suppose . If , must divide or , so or .□
Exercise 290.3.
7bd246Suppose are distinct primary ideals. Show that .
Proof.
It suffices to show that are pairwise comaximal. Let . is prime and hence maximal for each . So, and are comaximal for all . In any commutative ring, implies for all ideals and positive integers (just raise the identity to the power ). Thus, it follows that and are comaximal for all .□
Exercise 290.4.
bb9980Show that every proper ideal in can be expressed as a finite intersection of primary ideals.
Proof.
Note that the manner in which we constructed the primary decomposition here ensures that it is irredundant, i.e, all the primary ideals are distinct and removing any one of them changes the intersection.
[!Exercise]
Suppose , where and is irreducible for all . Let . Describe in terms of .
[!Exercise]
Show that . Is it possible to write as a direct product of fields?
[!Exercise]
For any ideal in , show that there are only finitely many maximal ideals that contain .