All rings are commutative with .
Problem 11
Let be a PID.
Exercise 290.1.
389f77Let be a proper ideal in . Show that for some maximal ideals .
Proof.
Suppose. Since is a UFD, we can write as a product of irreducibles . Each is prime, so each is a prime ideal, and hence each is maximal. It is now easy to see that .□
Exercise 290.2.
cf1276An ideal in is said to be primary if and implies for some . Show that an ideal is primary iff for some irreducible element .
Proof.
Let where for irreducibles . Suppose is primary. Suppose and are not associates. Let have associates in . Let and . Then, . However, does not divide for any , and does not divide for any . So, does not divide or for any , a contradiction. Thus, every pair in is a pair of associates. It follows that .
Suppose . If , must divide or , so or .□
Exercise 290.3.
7bd246Suppose are distinct primary ideals. Show that .
Proof.
It suffices to show that are pairwise comaximal. Let . is prime and hence maximal for each . So, and are comaximal for all . In any commutative ring, implies for all ideals and positive integers (just raise the identity to the power ). Thus, it follows that and are comaximal for all .□
Exercise 290.4.
bb9980Show that every proper ideal in can be expressed as a finite intersection of primary ideals.
Proof.
Write where are irreducible, by Exercise 1. Let be the unique elements among up to association. Then, we can write . Let and note that is primary by Exercise 2. By Exercise 3, we have .□
[!Exercise]
Suppose , where and is irreducible for all . Let . Describe in terms of .
[!Exercise]
Show that . Is it possible to write as a direct product of fields?
[!Exercise]
For any ideal in , show that there are only finitely many maximal ideals that contain .