Partitions of unity
The support of a function is defined to be the closure of the set of all points at which is nonzero.
Lemma 198.1(Spivak (1965) Problem 1-22).
e725d8If is open and is compact, there exists a compact set such that and .
Lemma 198.2.
0ebb23If is an open cover of a compact set , then there exist compact sets such that covers .
Proof.
Let
is compact. By Lemma 1, there exists compact such that .
Suppose compact have been chosen so that covers . Let
is compact, so there exists compact such that .□
Lemma 198.3(Spivak (1965) Problem 2-26).
cb0f59Suppose is open, is compact. Then, there exists a function such that for all and is outside a closed set in , that is, .
Theorem 198.4(Spivak (1965) 3-11).
8f65c8Let and let be an open cover of . Then there is a countable collection of functions defined in an open set containing , with the following properties:
- For each and , we have .
- For each , there exists an open set such that all but finitely many are on .
- For each , we have (this is a finite sum by (2))
- For each , there exists such that .
A collection satisfying (1) to (3) is called a partition of unity for . If also satisfies (4), it is said to be subordinate to the cover .
Proof.
Case 1: is compact
Let be a finite subcover of . It clearly suffices to construct a partition of unity subordinate to this cover. Let be given by Lemma 2. By Lemma 3, we can choose non-negative functions with .
Let . It follows that for all in . On we can define
By Lemma 3, there exists a function which is on and outside of some closed set in . is the desired partition of unity 1.
Case 2: , where each is compact and
For each let consist of all for 2. Then is an open cover of the compact set . By case 1, there is a partition of unity for subordinate to . For each the sum
is a finite sum in some open set containing , since if , then must have a neighborhood in , so we have for with . For each in each , define . The collection of all is the desired partition of unity.
Case 3: is open
Let
and note that . Apply case 2.
Case 4: is arbitrary
Let be the union of all in . By case 3 there is a partition of unity for ; this is also a partition of unity for .□
Note:
- The partitions of unity we constructed were countable in every case.
- Each is compactly supported.
Integration on arbitrary open sets
So far we have defined the integrability of bounded functions on closed rectangles in , and then extended this notion to bounded functions on Jordan-measurable subsets of .
Not every open set is Jordan-measurable; this could be merely due to it being unbounded, but examples of bounded open sets which are not Jordan measurable exist (Ramadas, n.d.). We now define the class of absolutely integrable functions on an arbitrary open set . In case is bounded and Jordan measurable, this new definition will agree with the earlier one.
Definition 198.5.
1c2a4bAn open cover of an open set is said to be admissible if each is contained in .
Let be open and be an admissible open cover. By Theorem 4, there exists a countable family subordinate to of nonnegative continuous functions with compact support such that locally finitely many are non-zero. Let be such that
- is bounded in some open set around each point of (so is bounded on any closed rectangle in ), and
- the set of discontinuities of has measure zero.
Then, exists3 for each . We define to be integrable if
Since the ‘s are nonnegative, this implies , which implies the absolute convergence of , which we define to be 4
The following theorem proves soundness and backward compatibility of Definition 5.
Theorem 198.6(Spivak (1965) 3-12).
- Definition 5 does not depend on or . That is, if is another partition of unity subordinate to an admissible open cover of , then also converges, and
Proof.
Since except on some compact set , and there are only finitely many which are non-zero on 5, we can write
E1This result, applied to , show the convergence of , and hence of . This absolute convergence justifies interchanging the order of summation in (E1); the resulting expression becomes 6
This result applied to proves convergence of .□
- If and are bounded, then exists.
Proof.
If is contained in the closed rectangle and for , and is finite, then
since on .□
- If is Jordan-measurable and is bounded, Definition 5 agrees with Definition 196.2, that is, .
Proof.
If , there is a compact Jordan-measurable such that . Again, there are only finitely many which are nonzero on . If is any finite collection which includes these, then
□
Footnotes
-
Note that the ‘s (and hence the ‘s) bleed out of ; we introduce only to ensure that the support of each function in is contained in . ↩
-
Take to be . ↩
-
As previously noted, we cannot rely on being Jordan measurable here. Recall that has compact support , which must be contained in since is admissible. We can cover by a collection of finitely many disjoint closed rectangles. Thus, the integral becomes , which exists thanks to our hypotheses regarding . ↩
-
Integrals using the new definition will be embellished with ~ in this article. ↩
-
For each , let be a neighborhood of such that only finitely many ‘s are nonzero on . is an open cover of , of which there exists a finite subcover. ↩
-
For each fixed , only finitely many of the ‘s are relevant, which allows us to swap the sum and integral. ↩