Recall what an inner product space is. Now, define . Define
Note that first of all the integral exists. iff follows from Kumaresan (2005) Lemma 1.1.11. The rest of the properties of the inner product follow from the properties of the Riemann integral. Given an inner product on a vector space, we can always define a norm on the vector space by
On ,
On , we can also define a sup-norm
Theorem 173.1.
9dd2a2is a complete normed linear space.
Proof.
We have to show that every Cauchy sequence in converges (in , of course). Suppose is a Cauchy sequence in . Then, given , such that . So, satisfies the Cauchy criterion for uniform convergence. Thus, , where is continuous due to Theorem 155.6.□
Note that and , where the latter uses the norm induced by the inner product, are different spaces. The first one is complete, and the second one is not. As a counterexample, consider the sequence of functions in . They converge to a function which is at and everywhere else - certainly not in . However, the sequence of functions is a Cauchy sequence with respect to : For every , such that . While we are at it, also note that is not a Cauchy sequence in .
Refer Treil (2014) chapter 5 for parallelogram identity, polarization identity, and the relation between norms and inner products. Basically, every inner product space can be made into a NLS by the standard definition (). However, an inner product can be defined on an NLS iff the norm satisfies the parallelogram law.